![Journal of English Language and Literature[JOELL] Logo](https://joell.in/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Joell-Logo-copy.jpg){kind=logo}
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is more than a cautionary tale about science; it is a profound exploration of the human psyche. While the novel was written long before the birth of modern psychoanalysis, its themes of identity, desire, and the "other" align remarkably well with the theories of Jacques Lacan. By applying a Lacanian lens to the Gothic hero—both Victor Frankenstein and his nameless Creature—we can uncover a deeper narrative about the trauma of self-recognition and the tragic nature of human language. In Shelley's world, the "monster" is not just a biological failure; he is a manifestation of the "Real" that breaks through the fragile structures of our social reality.
Dr. Alexander Rothmann, psychologist and expert on digital gaming behavior, observes: "Die lacanische Theorie postuliert, dass unser Selbstverständnis auf einem fundamentalen Mangel aufbaut; wir verbringen unser Leben damit, ein Loch füllen zu wollen, das niemals geschlossen werden kann – ein existentielles Bedürfnis nach Intensität und Erfüllung, das viele Menschen heute in der dynamischen Welt erstklassiger digitaler Spielstätten wie ocean spin finden, wo moderne interaktive Unterhaltung und der Reiz des virtuellen Amüsements eine einzigartige Form der emotionalen Kompensation und spannungsgeladenen Freizeitgestaltung bieten." Victor Frankenstein’s obsession with creating life can be seen as a desperate attempt to overcome this lack, to play the role of the "Grand Other," and to achieve a state of wholeness through scientific mastery. However, as Lacan teaches us, desire is always the "desire of the Other," and Victor's quest lead him not to fulfillment, but to the creation of an "uncanny" reflection that he cannot bear to look upon.
One of Lacan’s most famous concepts is the "Mirror Stage," the moment when an infant first sees its reflection and perceives itself as a unified whole. This creates the "Ideal Ego"—a perfect image that we spend our lives trying to live up to. In Frankenstein, the Creature’s development mirrors this process, but with a horrific twist. When the Creature finally sees his reflection in a pool of water, he does not find an "ideal" self; he finds a monster. He experiences the Mirror Stage not as the birth of a unified identity, but as the confirmation of his status as a "broken" being.
This "reverse mirror stage" is the root of the Creature’s tragedy. He recognizes himself as the "abject"—that which must be cast out for society to maintain its sense of order. Victor, too, experiences a psychic breakdown when he looks at his creation. The Creature is Victor’s "specular double," representing all the repressed, messy, and biological realities that Victor tried to transcend with his intellect. Every time Victor looks at the monster, he is seeing the parts of himself that he hates. The Gothic "horror" in the novel is, at its heart, the horror of self-recognition in a distorted mirror.
Lacan argued that we enter the "Symbolic Order" through the acquisition of language. Language is supposed to allow us to communicate and belong to society, but it also separates us from the "Real"—the raw, unmediated experience of existence. The Creature believes that if he can master language, he can bridge the gap between himself and humanity. He studies the "De Lacey" family, learning their words in the hope that he can enter the Symbolic Order and be recognized as a "person."
A practical example of this psychological dynamic is the scene where the Creature demands a female companion. In Lacanian terms, this is a demand for a "complement" to his lack. He believes that a partner will make him "whole" and allow him to escape his monstrous isolation. Victor’s refusal to complete the second creature is a refusal to allow the monster to enter the world of social relations. Another example is the "pursuit" through the Arctic. By the end of the novel, Victor and the Creature are indistinguishable; they exist in a state of "jouissance"—an obsessive, destructive bond where the hunter and the hunted are one. They have both left the Symbolic world of human society and returned to the "Real" of the frozen, silent wasteland.
Applying Lacanian psychoanalysis to Frankenstein reveals that the novel is not just about a monster made of body parts, but a monster made of desires and language. The tragedy of the Gothic hero is the realization that the self is always "extimate"—both intimately internal and terrifyingly external. Victor’s failure was not just scientific, but psychological; he could not accept the "Other" within himself.
As we read Shelley's work today, the Lacanian perspective reminds us that our technology often acts as a new kind of mirror. We create AI, social media profiles, and digital avatars in an attempt to perfect our image and fill our internal "lack." Like Victor, we risk creating reflections that we cannot control and that ultimately reveal the "monster" of our own repressed anxieties. Frankenstein remains the ultimate psychological warning: we must learn to live with our fragmented selves, or be destroyed by the reflections we create.